Skip to content

Conversation

@khoa-nguyen-18
Copy link
Contributor

@khoa-nguyen-18 khoa-nguyen-18 commented Aug 15, 2025

Referring to r_flash_hp #64
Since in Zephyr, we does not define the .ram_from_flash section, we use the .ramfunc section, which has the same functional definition for r_flash_lp.
Detail information: #64 (comment)

@khoa-nguyen-18
Copy link
Contributor Author

hi @KhiemNguyenT, could you please have a look at this PR?

@KhiemNguyenT KhiemNguyenT self-requested a review August 15, 2025 04:20
@KhiemNguyenT KhiemNguyenT self-assigned this Aug 15, 2025
@KhiemNguyenT
Copy link
Collaborator

@khoa-nguyen-18 why is that change necessary ?

@khoa-nguyen-18
Copy link
Contributor Author

khoa-nguyen-18 commented Aug 15, 2025

@khoa-nguyen-18 why is that change necessary ?

I changed this by referring to r_flash_hp #64. Since in Zephyr, we does not define the .ram_from_flash section, we use the .ramfunc section, which has the same functional definition for r_flash_lp.

@KhiemNguyenT
Copy link
Collaborator

@khoa-nguyen-18 next times, please make sure to mention the rationale/purpose of the patch.
And please update the README file, similar with the change in PR #64.

Move the place to store bsp from .ram_from_flash section to .ramfunc
for r_flash_lp

Signed-off-by: Khoa Nguyen <[email protected]>
@khoa-nguyen-18 khoa-nguyen-18 force-pushed the support_renesas_ra4_flash branch from 5320676 to 79962d7 Compare August 15, 2025 06:38
@khoa-nguyen-18
Copy link
Contributor Author

@khoa-nguyen-18 next times, please make sure to mention the rationale/purpose of the patch. And please update the README file, similar with the change in PR #64.

Thank you, I have updated the README file.
Apologies for missing the rationale in this patch. I’ll make sure to include the rationale and purpose in future PR

@KhiemNguyenT KhiemNguyenT merged commit 0cdd997 into zephyrproject-rtos:main Aug 18, 2025
@khoa-nguyen-18 khoa-nguyen-18 deleted the support_renesas_ra4_flash branch August 18, 2025 05:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants